<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sci Fi Saturday Night</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:36:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 49 &#8211; Lovecraft and Sons by Wyrd On Sci-Fi Saturday Night &#124; Wyrdstuff</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1561&#038;cpage=1#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyrd On Sci-Fi Saturday Night &#124; Wyrdstuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1561#comment-162</guid>
		<description>[...] we at Wyrd had the odd, yet pleasurable sensation of geeking out with the folks over at Sci-Fi Saturday Night.  Much was discussed with The Dome, Kriana, Illustrator X, AwakeByJava, and The Dead Redhead [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we at Wyrd had the odd, yet pleasurable sensation of geeking out with the folks over at Sci-Fi Saturday Night.  Much was discussed with The Dome, Kriana, Illustrator X, AwakeByJava, and The Dead Redhead [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ten Things I Learned at Rifftrax: by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1398&#038;cpage=1#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1398#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s count it anyway.......!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s count it anyway&#8230;&#8230;.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ten Things I Learned at Rifftrax: by Kriana</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1398&#038;cpage=1#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Kriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1398#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Wrong post silly... are you drunk? We clearly said the post with the podcast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong post silly&#8230; are you drunk? We clearly said the post with the podcast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ten Things I Learned at Rifftrax: by Sc00ter</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1398&#038;cpage=1#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Sc00ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1398#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Comment! You drunk freaks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment! You drunk freaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ten Things I Learned at Rifftrax: by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1398&#038;cpage=1#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1398#comment-158</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using gasoline for years to clean clothes. As a rule it works fine but you should stay away from that &quot;weed guy&quot; when &quot;cleaning&quot;. Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using gasoline for years to clean clothes. As a rule it works fine but you should stay away from that &#8220;weed guy&#8221; when &#8220;cleaning&#8221;. Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to Google by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1324&#038;cpage=1#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1324#comment-157</guid>
		<description>PS
When I get the source code I am renaming it The Dome Wave!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS<br />
When I get the source code I am renaming it The Dome Wave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spidey Resurrection or Broadway Turns Dark&#8230;..Again by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1332&#038;cpage=1#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1332#comment-156</guid>
		<description>~points up and snickers~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~points up and snickers~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spidey Resurrection or Broadway Turns Dark&#8230;..Again by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1332&#038;cpage=1#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1332#comment-155</guid>
		<description>No no no no no!!!!!  I&#039;m sorry, but this is just awful.  First of all, U2 soundtrack.  U2 is what jocks listen to when they want to look all socially conscious but would rather listen to a band that has a guitar player named &quot;The Edge&quot; instead of Paul Simon, who looks like the guys they beat up for not recognizing how awesome &quot;The Edge&quot; is.  Spider-Man has about as much in common with U2 as Bill Clinton has in common with Billy Beer (if you got that reference, congratulations.  It means you actually saw Star Wars in a theatre before anyone wore a Nine Inch Nails shirt or memorized all the goddamn lines).  

Next, Julie Taymor.  This has been the #1 defense of this broadway monstrosity.  Now, I admit that I loved The Lion King as much as the next guy --- I was blown away and cried my eyes out at the sheer majesty of it all.  Hell, one of my friends was actually created by her dad.  No, not like that, you perv --- her dad pioneered test tube baby technology and my buddy is around to borrow my Prisoner DVDs for 2 years at a time as a result.  But I digress...  Anyway, Julie Taymor also did &quot;Titus&quot;.  For those of you who don&#039;t watch IFC, &quot;Titus&quot; is a piss-poor version of &quot;Last House On The Left&quot; --- chick gets raped and mutilated, and family goes after the assailants.  However, this piece of Z-movie drek was written by WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, so untold generations have revered this piece of crap as pure gold.  Well, it&#039;s not.  And I&#039;m sorry, but directing a bad Shakespeare play does not make you a good director.  It means that you have a poor choice in source material.  Julie, I&#039;m really impressed with the job you did directing a Disney cartoon featuring Elton John and Blackadder, but stay the hell away from Spider-Man.  Why?  BECAUSE IT&#039;S SPIDER-MAN, GODDAMNIT!!!  IT&#039;S NOT SOMETHING I WANT TO WATCH YOU DESTROY FOR TWO GODDAMN HOURS!!!  I already suffered that kind of heartbreak with &quot;Superman Returns&quot;, and God knows I don&#039;t need to see Spider-Man sing about how Aunt May needs an operation and how Mary Jane just doesn&#039;t understand his need to put on a full body-stocking in public.  I leave the web-fluid to your tawdry imagination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no no no no!!!!!  I&#8217;m sorry, but this is just awful.  First of all, U2 soundtrack.  U2 is what jocks listen to when they want to look all socially conscious but would rather listen to a band that has a guitar player named &#8220;The Edge&#8221; instead of Paul Simon, who looks like the guys they beat up for not recognizing how awesome &#8220;The Edge&#8221; is.  Spider-Man has about as much in common with U2 as Bill Clinton has in common with Billy Beer (if you got that reference, congratulations.  It means you actually saw Star Wars in a theatre before anyone wore a Nine Inch Nails shirt or memorized all the goddamn lines).  </p>
<p>Next, Julie Taymor.  This has been the #1 defense of this broadway monstrosity.  Now, I admit that I loved The Lion King as much as the next guy &#8212; I was blown away and cried my eyes out at the sheer majesty of it all.  Hell, one of my friends was actually created by her dad.  No, not like that, you perv &#8212; her dad pioneered test tube baby technology and my buddy is around to borrow my Prisoner DVDs for 2 years at a time as a result.  But I digress&#8230;  Anyway, Julie Taymor also did &#8220;Titus&#8221;.  For those of you who don&#8217;t watch IFC, &#8220;Titus&#8221; is a piss-poor version of &#8220;Last House On The Left&#8221; &#8212; chick gets raped and mutilated, and family goes after the assailants.  However, this piece of Z-movie drek was written by WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, so untold generations have revered this piece of crap as pure gold.  Well, it&#8217;s not.  And I&#8217;m sorry, but directing a bad Shakespeare play does not make you a good director.  It means that you have a poor choice in source material.  Julie, I&#8217;m really impressed with the job you did directing a Disney cartoon featuring Elton John and Blackadder, but stay the hell away from Spider-Man.  Why?  BECAUSE IT&#8217;S SPIDER-MAN, GODDAMNIT!!!  IT&#8217;S NOT SOMETHING I WANT TO WATCH YOU DESTROY FOR TWO GODDAMN HOURS!!!  I already suffered that kind of heartbreak with &#8220;Superman Returns&#8221;, and God knows I don&#8217;t need to see Spider-Man sing about how Aunt May needs an operation and how Mary Jane just doesn&#8217;t understand his need to put on a full body-stocking in public.  I leave the web-fluid to your tawdry imagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to Google by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1324&#038;cpage=1#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1324#comment-154</guid>
		<description>IMHO Sc00ter, yer blowin&#039; smoke. I have yet to find an app that does what Wave does, so my offer still stands to Mr. Google. Offer me your source code for Wave, if you&#039;re not gonna keep it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO Sc00ter, yer blowin&#8217; smoke. I have yet to find an app that does what Wave does, so my offer still stands to Mr. Google. Offer me your source code for Wave, if you&#8217;re not gonna keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to Google by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1324&#038;cpage=1#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1324#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Hey, I thought it was a very user-friendly app... and this is coming from a guy who has yet to move on from his Atari 2600.  Please don&#039;t take it away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I thought it was a very user-friendly app&#8230; and this is coming from a guy who has yet to move on from his Atari 2600.  Please don&#8217;t take it away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to Google by Sc00ter</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1324&#038;cpage=1#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Sc00ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1324#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Google wave is crap.. There was very little that you couldn&#039;t do with normal gmail.

If you didn&#039;t have to re-add all your contacts and have a separate googlewave address it might have been more widely adopted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google wave is crap.. There was very little that you couldn&#8217;t do with normal gmail.</p>
<p>If you didn&#8217;t have to re-add all your contacts and have a separate googlewave address it might have been more widely adopted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 46 &#8211; Who needs a Guest Anyway? by Tweets that mention Talkcast 46 – Who needs a Guest Anyway? &#124; Sci Fi Saturday Night -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1314&#038;cpage=1#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Talkcast 46 – Who needs a Guest Anyway? &#124; Sci Fi Saturday Night -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1314#comment-150</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Lester, Zardoz. Zardoz said: Zardoz: Talkcast 46 – Who needs a Guest Anyway? &#124; Sci Fi Saturday Night: Comment on this post with the best appear... http://bit.ly/cx0KNF [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Lester, Zardoz. Zardoz said: Zardoz: Talkcast 46 – Who needs a Guest Anyway? | Sci Fi Saturday Night: Comment on this post with the best appear&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/cx0KNF" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cx0KNF</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TalkCast 45- This Avatar Isn&#8217;t Blue by MonsterDad</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1297&#038;cpage=1#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>MonsterDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 03:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1297#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Great show!  First-time caller, short-time listener.  This is only the second SFSN show I&#039;ve heard, but will be listening to more.

I was at the Spooktacular show in Keene last week and my daughter was the little girl down front imitating the giant mantises in &quot;Son of Godzilla&quot; who was mentioned in the recap on the show.  It was great to hear her mentioned in a podcast!

Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great show!  First-time caller, short-time listener.  This is only the second SFSN show I&#8217;ve heard, but will be listening to more.</p>
<p>I was at the Spooktacular show in Keene last week and my daughter was the little girl down front imitating the giant mantises in &#8220;Son of Godzilla&#8221; who was mentioned in the recap on the show.  It was great to hear her mentioned in a podcast!</p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 44 &#8211; Godzilla? Damn Right, Godzilla by almarnik</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1265&#038;cpage=1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>almarnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1265#comment-146</guid>
		<description>That comic looks cool!  I likee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That comic looks cool!  I likee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TalkCast 32 &#8211; The Last Man Anthology &amp; Skeptics by Tweets that mention TalkCast 32 – The Last Man Anthology &#38; Skeptics &#124; Sci Fi Saturday Night -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1046&#038;cpage=1#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention TalkCast 32 – The Last Man Anthology &#38; Skeptics &#124; Sci Fi Saturday Night -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1046#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sword &amp; Saga Press and Sword &amp; Saga Press, Aaron M. Wilson. Aaron M. Wilson said: Listen to an interview with Hunter Liguore, editor of &quot;The Last Man Anthology&quot; http://bit.ly/9Zht1Y [last 1/2 of program] @SwordSagaPress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sword &amp; Saga Press and Sword &amp; Saga Press, Aaron M. Wilson. Aaron M. Wilson said: Listen to an interview with Hunter Liguore, editor of &quot;The Last Man Anthology&quot; <a href="http://bit.ly/9Zht1Y" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9Zht1Y</a> [last 1/2 of program] @SwordSagaPress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Browncoats Redemption- A Big Damn Review by Tweets that mention Browncoats Redemption- A Big Damn Review &#124; Sci Fi Saturday Night -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1206&#038;cpage=1#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Browncoats Redemption- A Big Damn Review &#124; Sci Fi Saturday Night -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1206#comment-144</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by browncoatsmovie, CJWellman. CJWellman said: Lovely little review of the rough cut of Browncoats:Redemption (@browncoatsmovie): http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1206 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by browncoatsmovie, CJWellman. CJWellman said: Lovely little review of the rough cut of Browncoats:Redemption (@browncoatsmovie): <a href="http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1206" rel="nofollow">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1206</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 43 &#8211; Zombies and Cheerleaders and Browncoats, Oh My! by inkbot01</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1231&#038;cpage=1#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>inkbot01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1231#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Awesome, this is my first time listening to the podcast and it&#039;s awesome! I enjoyed it very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, this is my first time listening to the podcast and it&#8217;s awesome! I enjoyed it very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our New Look and &#8230;. why am I not in San Diego? by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1241&#038;cpage=1#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1241#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Not to correct anyone, Kriana, but that would be &quot;MORE&quot; enhancements on the way, and the new look is awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to correct anyone, Kriana, but that would be &#8220;MORE&#8221; enhancements on the way, and the new look is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our New Look and &#8230;. why am I not in San Diego? by Kriana</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1241&#038;cpage=1#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Kriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1241#comment-141</guid>
		<description>The changes aren&#039;t done yet! I just forgot to change it back after I spiffified the top. Is spiffified a word?

New enhancements on the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The changes aren&#8217;t done yet! I just forgot to change it back after I spiffified the top. Is spiffified a word?</p>
<p>New enhancements on the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 42 – It’s Tesla’s Birthday by fool.of.history</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>fool.of.history</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1224#comment-140</guid>
		<description>You know, I still haven&#039;t been able to quite pin point my 
problems with this new series of Doctor Who. I think it is 
mostly culmination of little things; some of it poor writing,
bad dialogue, lack of or poor use of music, some what 
more two dimensional characters, plots that felt
a little weak and a series arc that took too much focus
away from each individual episode. However, looking at 
the big picture, I&#039;ve realized that have been making all 
these judgments in comparison to the previous five years.

The relaunch or Doctor Who in 2005 was miraculous in the
first place. It seemed like modern day television and 
science fiction wouldn&#039;t allow a concept as wacky as
Doctor Who; not to mention that the show had been aired
for 26 series and had already failed at an attempt to be
relaunch..... regenerated (tee hee). It was a general 
acceptance that Doctor Who was done.

However, with an excellent crew, an  experienced 
and enthusiastic Russle T. Davies, and a few good people 
at the BBC, there was one last chance to once again give 
Doctor Who new life. With the casting of Christopher 
Eccleston as the Doctor and Billie Piper as the companion, 
the show got the publicity it needed for the public to 
tune in. 

The result was a brand new and absolutely amazing new 
Doctor Who; with excellent directing, sharp writing, 
wonderfully well placed musical scores, a fun and 
sexy new companion in Rose Tyler, and, most importantly,
a Fantastic 9th Doctor. All of this lead to compelling and 
entertaining stories, emotional moments and an absolutely
mind blowing series finale; which of course gave us a new
Doctor in David Tennant.

The trend continued to run with the 10th Doctor. More 
incredible stories, more amazing new companions and 
more incredible finales. The David Tennant Doctor became
so Brilliant and so popular that he became only the second 
actor to become the iconic image for the Doctor. 
The show was up and running stronger than ever before as
the world rejoiced in the new Golden Age of Doctor Who;
without a doubt the best show on television.

Now we have an entirely new-new age of Doctor Who. An
entirely new crew has been assigned, a new head writer in 
Stephen Moffat, a new main companion with Amy Pond
and a brand new Doctor in Matt Smith. The feel and 
direction has changed and it is difficult to become 
accustomed. The new team seems a bit rusty and 
inexperienced, and i have not quite felt the same about it
as I have in the Davies era.

However, it is still good in it&#039;s own right. Is it as good as it 
was? No. Will it be? Of course not! The Davies era was 
absolutely was as close to perfect story-telling as it gets.
Unique circumstances lead to an absolute dream team of 
writers, actors, directors, producers and stage crew that
is rarely seen in this day and age and can never be 
reproduced. So to even try to compare this new series to 
previous is unfair. Stephen Moffat and Matt Smith have had 
giant shoes to fill. Coming off of the End of Time and right
into their ownera was an amazingly difficult task. There 
were bound to bumps and bruises along the way and we 
should expect such. 

Is Stephen Moffat revolutionary? No. Does the show
still pack the awe inspiring punch? No. Is Matt Smith&#039;s
Doctor absolutely Fantastic or Brilliant? No.
But you know what? That&#039;s OK. Stephen Moffat is clever 
and imaginative. The show is still unique, intelligent and 
fun. And the 11th Doctor is quirky, hilarious and...... cool.
Yes, I too say Bravo Mr. Moffat. You&#039;ve managed to keep
the ball rolling despite extenuating circumstances. It will 
never be as good as it was, but when you compare it too
everything else, it is still the best damn show on television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I still haven&#8217;t been able to quite pin point my<br />
problems with this new series of Doctor Who. I think it is<br />
mostly culmination of little things; some of it poor writing,<br />
bad dialogue, lack of or poor use of music, some what<br />
more two dimensional characters, plots that felt<br />
a little weak and a series arc that took too much focus<br />
away from each individual episode. However, looking at<br />
the big picture, I&#8217;ve realized that have been making all<br />
these judgments in comparison to the previous five years.</p>
<p>The relaunch or Doctor Who in 2005 was miraculous in the<br />
first place. It seemed like modern day television and<br />
science fiction wouldn&#8217;t allow a concept as wacky as<br />
Doctor Who; not to mention that the show had been aired<br />
for 26 series and had already failed at an attempt to be<br />
relaunch&#8230;.. regenerated (tee hee). It was a general<br />
acceptance that Doctor Who was done.</p>
<p>However, with an excellent crew, an  experienced<br />
and enthusiastic Russle T. Davies, and a few good people<br />
at the BBC, there was one last chance to once again give<br />
Doctor Who new life. With the casting of Christopher<br />
Eccleston as the Doctor and Billie Piper as the companion,<br />
the show got the publicity it needed for the public to<br />
tune in. </p>
<p>The result was a brand new and absolutely amazing new<br />
Doctor Who; with excellent directing, sharp writing,<br />
wonderfully well placed musical scores, a fun and<br />
sexy new companion in Rose Tyler, and, most importantly,<br />
a Fantastic 9th Doctor. All of this lead to compelling and<br />
entertaining stories, emotional moments and an absolutely<br />
mind blowing series finale; which of course gave us a new<br />
Doctor in David Tennant.</p>
<p>The trend continued to run with the 10th Doctor. More<br />
incredible stories, more amazing new companions and<br />
more incredible finales. The David Tennant Doctor became<br />
so Brilliant and so popular that he became only the second<br />
actor to become the iconic image for the Doctor.<br />
The show was up and running stronger than ever before as<br />
the world rejoiced in the new Golden Age of Doctor Who;<br />
without a doubt the best show on television.</p>
<p>Now we have an entirely new-new age of Doctor Who. An<br />
entirely new crew has been assigned, a new head writer in<br />
Stephen Moffat, a new main companion with Amy Pond<br />
and a brand new Doctor in Matt Smith. The feel and<br />
direction has changed and it is difficult to become<br />
accustomed. The new team seems a bit rusty and<br />
inexperienced, and i have not quite felt the same about it<br />
as I have in the Davies era.</p>
<p>However, it is still good in it&#8217;s own right. Is it as good as it<br />
was? No. Will it be? Of course not! The Davies era was<br />
absolutely was as close to perfect story-telling as it gets.<br />
Unique circumstances lead to an absolute dream team of<br />
writers, actors, directors, producers and stage crew that<br />
is rarely seen in this day and age and can never be<br />
reproduced. So to even try to compare this new series to<br />
previous is unfair. Stephen Moffat and Matt Smith have had<br />
giant shoes to fill. Coming off of the End of Time and right<br />
into their ownera was an amazingly difficult task. There<br />
were bound to bumps and bruises along the way and we<br />
should expect such. </p>
<p>Is Stephen Moffat revolutionary? No. Does the show<br />
still pack the awe inspiring punch? No. Is Matt Smith&#8217;s<br />
Doctor absolutely Fantastic or Brilliant? No.<br />
But you know what? That&#8217;s OK. Stephen Moffat is clever<br />
and imaginative. The show is still unique, intelligent and<br />
fun. And the 11th Doctor is quirky, hilarious and&#8230;&#8230; cool.<br />
Yes, I too say Bravo Mr. Moffat. You&#8217;ve managed to keep<br />
the ball rolling despite extenuating circumstances. It will<br />
never be as good as it was, but when you compare it too<br />
everything else, it is still the best damn show on television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 42 – It’s Tesla’s Birthday by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1224#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Wow Emily,
Ever thought of a career in the incredibly low paying world of Blogging?
Ya  got a lot to say, and you do it well. Welcome to Sci Fi Saturday Night!
Dome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Emily,<br />
Ever thought of a career in the incredibly low paying world of Blogging?<br />
Ya  got a lot to say, and you do it well. Welcome to Sci Fi Saturday Night!<br />
Dome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 42 – It’s Tesla’s Birthday by Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1224#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t deny that I had problems with Season 5. It didn&#039;t feel as polished as it could have, it lacked a lot of technobabble, there were loose ends that I wanted tied up that weren&#039;t, I had issues with some of the directorial and musical choices..... But in spite of all that, I enjoyed this season greatly! A lot of this was due to Matt and Karen and their wacky energy and fantastic chemistry, but most of it was the stories themselves. The only two episodes I didn&#039;t care for were Victory of the Daleks and Vampires of Venice, and VotD could have been redeemed by a little technobabble and lack of technicolor Daleks (which I wouldn&#039;t have a problem with if their armor didn&#039;t look so cheap and plastic-y). As far as VoV goes, I think Toby Whithouse should just not be allowed to write any more, because he likes to come up with story ideas that should be awesome, but then he ruins them with crappy dialogue and unmemorable, unlikeable characters. But let&#039;s face it - disliking only 2 episodes out of 13 is pretty remarkable. Especially when you consider that I disliked 5 episodes from Season 1, 4 from Season 2, 4 from Season 3, and 3 from Season 4. Which means that when I consider the ratio of good-to-bad episodes, Moffat&#039;s run is seriously ahead so far.

On top of that, the episodes that had me the most worried this season turned out to be my favorites! Time of Angels and Flesh and Stone had me biting my nails that The Moff was planning to bring back both River Song AND the Weeping Angels, not only so soon, but in the same episode. Outcome? LOVED. IT. I immediately declared it to be the first episode since the reboot in 2005 that felt like an episode of Old Who. But my favorite episode of the season? The Lodger. Hands down. They took what should have been a ridiculous concept, and infused it with wit, insight, humor, horror, and romance, and solidified in my mind that it is in the small, intimate moments, that Matt Smith truly shines.

And then. AND THEN. As if all that weren&#039;t enough. Most episodes of previous seasons I have a limited capacity for. There are very few that I enjoy watching multiple times in short succession. But this season, I have watched every single episode (except for VoV, because it makes my teeth ache) at least 3 times, some of them more, and not only enjoyed them just as much on re-watching, but for the most part, enjoyed them MORE.

So I say bravo, Mr. Moffat. The show is in good hands. The kinks have been worked out, the rough edges smoothed, and I anticipate great things for Season 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t deny that I had problems with Season 5. It didn&#8217;t feel as polished as it could have, it lacked a lot of technobabble, there were loose ends that I wanted tied up that weren&#8217;t, I had issues with some of the directorial and musical choices&#8230;.. But in spite of all that, I enjoyed this season greatly! A lot of this was due to Matt and Karen and their wacky energy and fantastic chemistry, but most of it was the stories themselves. The only two episodes I didn&#8217;t care for were Victory of the Daleks and Vampires of Venice, and VotD could have been redeemed by a little technobabble and lack of technicolor Daleks (which I wouldn&#8217;t have a problem with if their armor didn&#8217;t look so cheap and plastic-y). As far as VoV goes, I think Toby Whithouse should just not be allowed to write any more, because he likes to come up with story ideas that should be awesome, but then he ruins them with crappy dialogue and unmemorable, unlikeable characters. But let&#8217;s face it &#8211; disliking only 2 episodes out of 13 is pretty remarkable. Especially when you consider that I disliked 5 episodes from Season 1, 4 from Season 2, 4 from Season 3, and 3 from Season 4. Which means that when I consider the ratio of good-to-bad episodes, Moffat&#8217;s run is seriously ahead so far.</p>
<p>On top of that, the episodes that had me the most worried this season turned out to be my favorites! Time of Angels and Flesh and Stone had me biting my nails that The Moff was planning to bring back both River Song AND the Weeping Angels, not only so soon, but in the same episode. Outcome? LOVED. IT. I immediately declared it to be the first episode since the reboot in 2005 that felt like an episode of Old Who. But my favorite episode of the season? The Lodger. Hands down. They took what should have been a ridiculous concept, and infused it with wit, insight, humor, horror, and romance, and solidified in my mind that it is in the small, intimate moments, that Matt Smith truly shines.</p>
<p>And then. AND THEN. As if all that weren&#8217;t enough. Most episodes of previous seasons I have a limited capacity for. There are very few that I enjoy watching multiple times in short succession. But this season, I have watched every single episode (except for VoV, because it makes my teeth ache) at least 3 times, some of them more, and not only enjoyed them just as much on re-watching, but for the most part, enjoyed them MORE.</p>
<p>So I say bravo, Mr. Moffat. The show is in good hands. The kinks have been worked out, the rough edges smoothed, and I anticipate great things for Season 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Farewell Jeanne by PetraMullen18</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1117&#038;cpage=1#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>PetraMullen18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1117#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I had got a dream to make my commerce, but I didn&#039;t have got enough amount of cash to do this. Thank God my close friend recommended to use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bestfinance-blog.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;loan&lt;/a&gt;. Thus I received the secured loan and made real my dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had got a dream to make my commerce, but I didn&#8217;t have got enough amount of cash to do this. Thank God my close friend recommended to use the <a href="http://bestfinance-blog.com" rel="nofollow">loan</a>. Thus I received the secured loan and made real my dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 42 – It’s Tesla’s Birthday by almarnik</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1224&#038;cpage=1#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>almarnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1224#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Excellent, enlightening and dashing live show tonight!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, enlightening and dashing live show tonight!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 6.12.10 by mrwashy</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1156&#038;cpage=1#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>mrwashy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1156#comment-132</guid>
		<description>That would be War Games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be War Games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 6.05.2010 by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1124&#038;cpage=1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1124#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Lux in L.A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lux in L.A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 5.29.10 by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1111&#038;cpage=1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 02:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1111#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Gummitch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gummitch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 5.22.10 by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1101&#038;cpage=1#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 00:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1101#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Nathan Fillion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan Fillion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Tim Burton due? by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1093&#038;cpage=1#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1093#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I just can&#039;t get excited about a Tim Burton film anymore.  The last one of his that blew me away was Big Fish; how many movies has he made since then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t get excited about a Tim Burton film anymore.  The last one of his that blew me away was Big Fish; how many movies has he made since then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 33 – The Robert Heinlein Special with guest Spider Robinson by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1069&#038;cpage=1#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1069#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Damn, that was fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, that was fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TalkCast 32 &#8211; The Last Man Anthology &amp; Skeptics by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1046&#038;cpage=1#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 20:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1046#comment-123</guid>
		<description>well, yeah. You can never project too far ahead, can you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, yeah. You can never project too far ahead, can you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TalkCast 32 &#8211; The Last Man Anthology &amp; Skeptics by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1046&#038;cpage=1#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 23:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1046#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Summer 3012?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summer 3012?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson by A special post about a special online fundraiser &#171; ArtSpider&#39;s ArtScene</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972&#038;cpage=1#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>A special post about a special online fundraiser &#171; ArtSpider&#39;s ArtScene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972#comment-121</guid>
		<description>[...] for Jeanne Robinson can be made at http://www.wedreamforjeanne.blogspot.com/. Please visit http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972 to see scans of the auction items. Help Jeanne Robinson win her battle against cancer!    &#9654; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Jeanne Robinson can be made at <a href="http://www.wedreamforjeanne.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wedreamforjeanne.blogspot.com/</a>. Please visit <a href="http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972" rel="nofollow">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972</a> to see scans of the auction items. Help Jeanne Robinson win her battle against cancer!    &#9654; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson by Locus Online News &#187; Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972&#038;cpage=1#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Locus Online News &#187; Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 21:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] The Sci Fi Saturday Night podcast is holding a charity auction for Jeanne Robinson, who has been fighting cancer. The auction will run from May 8 &#8211; 15, and includes artwork by Sergio Aragones, Mike Mignola, Ben Templesmith, and many others. Sci Fi Saturday Night has details. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Sci Fi Saturday Night podcast is holding a charity auction for Jeanne Robinson, who has been fighting cancer. The auction will run from May 8 &#8211; 15, and includes artwork by Sergio Aragones, Mike Mignola, Ben Templesmith, and many others. Sci Fi Saturday Night has details. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson by Atomic-Robo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972&#038;cpage=1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Atomic-Robo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972#comment-118</guid>
		<description>[...] Saturday Night is having a Charity Art Auction to raise money for Jeanine Robinson,  the wife of author Spider Robinson, who is dealing with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saturday Night is having a Charity Art Auction to raise money for Jeanine Robinson,  the wife of author Spider Robinson, who is dealing with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RAH – The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1003&#038;cpage=1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1003#comment-117</guid>
		<description>It won the Hugo for Best Novel in 1967.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won the Hugo for Best Novel in 1967.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 4.24.10 by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1012&#038;cpage=1#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=1012#comment-116</guid>
		<description>The actress is Yancy Butler

She was &quot;WitchBlade&quot; (a.k.a Det. Sara &quot;Pez&quot; Pezzini)
on TNT network.

Great show, too bad it only went two seasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actress is Yancy Butler</p>
<p>She was &#8220;WitchBlade&#8221; (a.k.a Det. Sara &#8220;Pez&#8221; Pezzini)<br />
on TNT network.</p>
<p>Great show, too bad it only went two seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972&#038;cpage=1#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972#comment-115</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by upwithgravity: Please RT! Fundraising auction for Jeanne Robinson http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972#more-972...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by upwithgravity: Please RT! Fundraising auction for Jeanne Robinson <a href="http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972#more-972.." rel="nofollow">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972#more-972..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RAH – I Will Fear No Evil by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=988&#038;cpage=1#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=988#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I’m torn on this one.  It’s an amazingly well-written book, with some of the most memorable and well-rounded characters I’ve read in a long time.  I can honestly say that I never knew what was going to happen next!  My problem is that I just couldn’t believe it.  I had no problem with the internal dialogue or the setting itself.  What got me was that everyone just accepted the fact that if you put a hetero male brain in a female body, that personality will be all female.  I mean, really?  Not even a little resistance?  Not even a “this is really, really weird and I’m feeling uncomfortable with these strange new feelings”?  

Okay, I could even accept our protagonist’s gusto in switching teams --- but then there’s all the people who knew the woman who the female body belonged to, being perfectly okay with this change.  Several of them end up having a physical relationship with this new person AND EVERYONE’S OKAY WITH THIS!!!  If a spouse or ex-lover of yours died, and their body was then used as a vessel for a brand-new personality of the opposite sex, would you really be so accepting of the new situation?  Wouldn’t you have any reservations about sleeping with this new amalgamation?

Having said that, I still heartily recommend this book.  It’s even more controversial than Stranger In A Strange Land and a great novel to debate with friends over a bottle or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m torn on this one.  It’s an amazingly well-written book, with some of the most memorable and well-rounded characters I’ve read in a long time.  I can honestly say that I never knew what was going to happen next!  My problem is that I just couldn’t believe it.  I had no problem with the internal dialogue or the setting itself.  What got me was that everyone just accepted the fact that if you put a hetero male brain in a female body, that personality will be all female.  I mean, really?  Not even a little resistance?  Not even a “this is really, really weird and I’m feeling uncomfortable with these strange new feelings”?  </p>
<p>Okay, I could even accept our protagonist’s gusto in switching teams &#8212; but then there’s all the people who knew the woman who the female body belonged to, being perfectly okay with this change.  Several of them end up having a physical relationship with this new person AND EVERYONE’S OKAY WITH THIS!!!  If a spouse or ex-lover of yours died, and their body was then used as a vessel for a brand-new personality of the opposite sex, would you really be so accepting of the new situation?  Wouldn’t you have any reservations about sleeping with this new amalgamation?</p>
<p>Having said that, I still heartily recommend this book.  It’s even more controversial than Stranger In A Strange Land and a great novel to debate with friends over a bottle or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson by Tweets that mention Please RT! Fundraising auction for Jeanne Robinson -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972&#038;cpage=1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Please RT! Fundraising auction for Jeanne Robinson -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Pritchard. Paul Pritchard said: RT @upwithgravity: Please RT! Fundraising auction for Jeanne Robinson http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Pritchard. Paul Pritchard said: RT @upwithgravity: Please RT! Fundraising auction for Jeanne Robinson <a href="http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972" rel="nofollow">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson by Charity auction for Jeanne Robinson&#8217;s cancer fund &#124; Geek News and Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972&#038;cpage=1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity auction for Jeanne Robinson&#8217;s cancer fund &#124; Geek News and Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=972#comment-112</guid>
		<description>[...] Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson  (Thanks, Brian!)  Previously: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Charity Auction for Jeanne Robinson  (Thanks, Brian!)  Previously: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 4.17.10 by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=940&#038;cpage=1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 00:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=940#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Silent Running

I really liked the part where Bruce Dern was
playing poker with bots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silent Running</p>
<p>I really liked the part where Bruce Dern was<br />
playing poker with bots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 26: Death of a Legend &#8211; Bazinga! by Tweets that mention Sci-Fi Saturday Night -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=907&#038;cpage=1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Sci-Fi Saturday Night -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=907#comment-108</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SheldonShirts. SheldonShirts said: Mike from SheldonShirts.com was recently interviewed on Sci Fi Saturday Night: http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=907 http://bit.ly/cvJiWX [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SheldonShirts. SheldonShirts said: Mike from SheldonShirts.com was recently interviewed on Sci Fi Saturday Night: <a href="http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=907" rel="nofollow">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=907</a> <a href="http://bit.ly/cvJiWX" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cvJiWX</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 4.3.10 by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=919&#038;cpage=1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=919#comment-107</guid>
		<description>So, let&#039;s try this again. A Mark 4 Ford Zodiac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, let&#8217;s try this again. A Mark 4 Ford Zodiac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 4.3.10 by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=919&#038;cpage=1#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 00:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=919#comment-106</guid>
		<description>It resembled a 1970 Citroen SM, but was based on
 the chassis of Ford Zephyr with specially built
aluminium body shell.

Great Show. The girls were the coolist thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It resembled a 1970 Citroen SM, but was based on<br />
 the chassis of Ford Zephyr with specially built<br />
aluminium body shell.</p>
<p>Great Show. The girls were the coolist thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 3.27.10 by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=896&#038;cpage=1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=896#comment-104</guid>
		<description>The cat&#039;s name is Pixel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cat&#8217;s name is Pixel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: The Orffyreus Wheel by Sci-Fi Saturday Night</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=889&#038;cpage=1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Sci-Fi Saturday Night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=889#comment-103</guid>
		<description>[...] Review of David Niall Wilsons Orffeyreus Wheel and and 30% off coupon for our listeners. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Review of David Niall Wilsons Orffeyreus Wheel and and 30% off coupon for our listeners. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 3.20.10 by hood1707</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=866&#038;cpage=1#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>hood1707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=866#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Gina Torres</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gina Torres</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 3.13.10 by Sc00ter</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=833&#038;cpage=1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Sc00ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=833#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Majel Barrett-Roddenberry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Majel Barrett-Roddenberry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finally, Proof that Television is Bad for You by deadredhead</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=830&#038;cpage=1#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>deadredhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=830#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget Dome, we have the 10th season of Smallville to look forward to!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget Dome, we have the 10th season of Smallville to look forward to!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 23 &#8211; Special Guest: David Niall Wilson by SCI-FI Saturday Night Interview Podcast Live &#124; David Niall Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=816&#038;cpage=1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>SCI-FI Saturday Night Interview Podcast Live &#124; David Niall Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=816#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] The link is here : Sci-Fi Saturday Night [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The link is here : Sci-Fi Saturday Night [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.6.10 Trivia #1 by D-Train</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=698&#038;cpage=1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>D-Train</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=698#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Vast Active Living Intelligence System....or Intelligent system.  I think that&#039;s right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vast Active Living Intelligence System&#8230;.or Intelligent system.  I think that&#8217;s right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.6.10 Trivia #2 by D-Train</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=699&#038;cpage=1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>D-Train</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=699#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe no one has answered this yet!  It&#039;s the I-Ching!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe no one has answered this yet!  It&#8217;s the I-Ching!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 2.13.10 by empressith</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=744&#038;cpage=1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>empressith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 06:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=744#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know but I know he had as a sidekick a member of the Inuit tribe that he referred to as &quot;Pieface&quot; until the 1970s. I think when Hal and Ollie were travelling around, Ollie taught Hal to respect native people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know but I know he had as a sidekick a member of the Inuit tribe that he referred to as &#8220;Pieface&#8221; until the 1970s. I think when Hal and Ollie were travelling around, Ollie taught Hal to respect native people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 2.13.10 by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=744&#038;cpage=1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=744#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Umm... yeah?  Well, who was Hal Jordan&#039;s pet?  Seriously, he used to have a little plant on his right shoulder as a sidekick back in the late 70&#039;s/early 80&#039;s.  Guess correctly and win a free pphoto of Dome in the &quot;slave Leia&quot; outfit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; yeah?  Well, who was Hal Jordan&#8217;s pet?  Seriously, he used to have a little plant on his right shoulder as a sidekick back in the late 70&#8242;s/early 80&#8242;s.  Guess correctly and win a free pphoto of Dome in the &#8220;slave Leia&#8221; outfit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 2.13.10 by empressith</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=744&#038;cpage=1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>empressith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=744#comment-93</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s easy. It was Beppo the Super Monkey. Supergirl&#039;s horse was Comet, her cat was Streaky and Superman&#039;s dog was Krypto, in case you were wondering :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s easy. It was Beppo the Super Monkey. Supergirl&#8217;s horse was Comet, her cat was Streaky and Superman&#8217;s dog was Krypto, in case you were wondering <img src='http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Human Target – Let’s Give It A Chance, but, I pun. by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=740&#038;cpage=1#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=740#comment-92</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re being charitable, Dome --- I watched the first episode, figured out who the killer was within the first ten minutes and spent the rest of the show watching Chi McBride&#039;s considerable talent get squandered.  I love the fact that there are more comic-based movies and TV series now than ever before, but they still need to be GOOD.  

&quot;Do we really need another Return of the Swamp Thing&quot;? --- Neil Gaiman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re being charitable, Dome &#8212; I watched the first episode, figured out who the killer was within the first ten minutes and spent the rest of the show watching Chi McBride&#8217;s considerable talent get squandered.  I love the fact that there are more comic-based movies and TV series now than ever before, but they still need to be GOOD.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Do we really need another Return of the Swamp Thing&#8221;? &#8212; Neil Gaiman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.6.10 Trivia #3 by trajeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=710&#038;cpage=1#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>trajeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=710#comment-91</guid>
		<description>&quot;Kipple&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kipple&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 1.30.2010 by magstheaxe</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=676&#038;cpage=1#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>magstheaxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=676#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Not sure how to add Priana (I was in the pottie when you announced that I won!).  What do I do--Skype?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how to add Priana (I was in the pottie when you announced that I won!).  What do I do&#8211;Skype?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 1.30.2010 by magstheaxe</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=676&#038;cpage=1#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>magstheaxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=676#comment-89</guid>
		<description>BILL CARDILLE!  (Chilly Billy)

His daughter Lori starred in DAY OF THE DEAD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BILL CARDILLE!  (Chilly Billy)</p>
<p>His daughter Lori starred in DAY OF THE DEAD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 17 by Kriana</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=660&#038;cpage=1#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Kriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=660#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t a Zombie Girl be the &quot;undead redhead&quot;? just sayin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a Zombie Girl be the &#8220;undead redhead&#8221;? just sayin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can Spielberg Bring Back Pinky and the Brain, too? by DeadRedHead</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=670&#038;cpage=1#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>DeadRedHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=670#comment-87</guid>
		<description>This is the Dead RedHead just checking in! Did anyone 
get the trivia question yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the Dead RedHead just checking in! Did anyone<br />
get the trivia question yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you haven&#8217;t already&#8230; by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=668&#038;cpage=1#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=668#comment-86</guid>
		<description>...as well as our profound thanks for supporting us and some very cool swag!
If you have any ideas for any merch. don&#039;t hesitate to contact us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;as well as our profound thanks for supporting us and some very cool swag!<br />
If you have any ideas for any merch. don&#8217;t hesitate to contact us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 15 by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=605&#038;cpage=1#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=605#comment-85</guid>
		<description>@ empressith
It is with pleasure that I shall continue to play the Bret Caaad.
On another note, TB is the bomb!
Dome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ empressith<br />
It is with pleasure that I shall continue to play the Bret Caaad.<br />
On another note, TB is the bomb!<br />
Dome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 15 by empressith</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=605&#038;cpage=1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>empressith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=605#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Continue to mock Brett Parker. It pleases me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continue to mock Brett Parker. It pleases me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 15 by empressith</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=605&#038;cpage=1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>empressith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=605#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Traci Belanger = bomb. Fear the Traci! Fear her!
Nice Neil Gaiman impression!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traci Belanger = bomb. Fear the Traci! Fear her!<br />
Nice Neil Gaiman impression!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 1.16.10 by markdb</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=634&#038;cpage=1#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>markdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=634#comment-82</guid>
		<description>wrestling ring announcer in Spider-Man 
 rude usher in Spider-Man 2
French maître d&#039; in Spider-Man 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrestling ring announcer in Spider-Man<br />
 rude usher in Spider-Man 2<br />
French maître d&#8217; in Spider-Man 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 1.16.10 by markdb</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=634&#038;cpage=1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>markdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=634#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Bruce Campbell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Campbell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 1.9.09 by guitarace2427</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=594&#038;cpage=1#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>guitarace2427</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=594#comment-80</guid>
		<description>both fantastical movies, featuring the great David Bowie as the Goblin King in Labyrinth, and Nikola Tesla in the Prestige!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both fantastical movies, featuring the great David Bowie as the Goblin King in Labyrinth, and Nikola Tesla in the Prestige!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 1.9.09 by mrwashy</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=594&#038;cpage=1#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>mrwashy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=594#comment-79</guid>
		<description>David Bowie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Bowie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 1.2.2010 by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=568&#038;cpage=1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=568#comment-78</guid>
		<description>congrats to Megan Higgins Gregory
Mark Hamill, Heath Ledger and Jack Nicholson.
January 2 at 10:00pm on Friday night on our Facebook page!. Yet another way to keep in touch with us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congrats to Megan Higgins Gregory<br />
Mark Hamill, Heath Ledger and Jack Nicholson.<br />
January 2 at 10:00pm on Friday night on our Facebook page!. Yet another way to keep in touch with us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 1.2.2010 by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=568&#038;cpage=1#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=568#comment-77</guid>
		<description>We have a winner who posted thier awnser on our Facebook page!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a winner who posted thier awnser on our Facebook page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The best Christmas list ever by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=553&#038;cpage=1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=553#comment-76</guid>
		<description>HOW THE HELL DID YOU FIND MY LIST???
Merry Happy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOW THE HELL DID YOU FIND MY LIST???<br />
Merry Happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 12.26.2009 by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=557&#038;cpage=1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=557#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Although this year gave us such disasters as Transformers 2 and GI Joe, the disappointment of the year has to go to the last ten minutes of the animated film 9.  I say disappointment because this was a creepy, atmospheric film that breathed new life into the tired sci-fi cliche of te &quot;post-apocalyptic world&quot; genre; however, the ending seemed like a pat, studio-decision cop-out to wrap everything up with a happy ending.  Didn&#039;t work for the Golden Compass film, doesn&#039;t work here now.  At least with Transformers, you knew this was going to be a godawful wreck --- 9 built up our expectations and crushed them at the last minute.  Disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this year gave us such disasters as Transformers 2 and GI Joe, the disappointment of the year has to go to the last ten minutes of the animated film 9.  I say disappointment because this was a creepy, atmospheric film that breathed new life into the tired sci-fi cliche of te &#8220;post-apocalyptic world&#8221; genre; however, the ending seemed like a pat, studio-decision cop-out to wrap everything up with a happy ending.  Didn&#8217;t work for the Golden Compass film, doesn&#8217;t work here now.  At least with Transformers, you knew this was going to be a godawful wreck &#8212; 9 built up our expectations and crushed them at the last minute.  Disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 12.26.2009 by mkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=557&#038;cpage=1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>mkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=557#comment-74</guid>
		<description>How about Dragonball.. as if the cartoon wasnt bad enough, they went and made a live action movie on it? And what&#039;s worse? Oh, that&#039;s right... the acting. Overall, just horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Dragonball.. as if the cartoon wasnt bad enough, they went and made a live action movie on it? And what&#8217;s worse? Oh, that&#8217;s right&#8230; the acting. Overall, just horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 12.26.2009 by Dru</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=557&#038;cpage=1#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=557#comment-73</guid>
		<description>can twilight be described as anything but a Disappointment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can twilight be described as anything but a Disappointment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 12.19.09 by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=533&#038;cpage=1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=533#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Whatever you do, DO NOT CHECK OUR TWITTERFEED FOR THE AWNSER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you do, DO NOT CHECK OUR TWITTERFEED FOR THE AWNSER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 12.12.2009 by mkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=525&#038;cpage=1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>mkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=525#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Oh, and to answer my own question.. Peter Milligan and then various partners.. but I was really going for whoever the cover artist is.. I&#039;m  loving it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and to answer my own question.. Peter Milligan and then various partners.. but I was really going for whoever the cover artist is.. I&#8217;m  loving it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 12.12.2009 by mkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=525&#038;cpage=1#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>mkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=525#comment-70</guid>
		<description>So I was able to find copies of all the Human Target comics.. He&#039;s got quite the past, appearing as far bas as 1972&#039;s Action Comics (419) with Superman, and then later in the Detective Comics (483) with my personal DC favorite.

Whoever took up the task of giving him his own comic in the has an incredible cover artist. I cant wait to read the stories to see what this Hero? is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I was able to find copies of all the Human Target comics.. He&#8217;s got quite the past, appearing as far bas as 1972&#8242;s Action Comics (419) with Superman, and then later in the Detective Comics (483) with my personal DC favorite.</p>
<p>Whoever took up the task of giving him his own comic in the has an incredible cover artist. I cant wait to read the stories to see what this Hero? is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 6 by mkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=408&#038;cpage=1#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>mkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=408#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Fox has good intentions, but they lack faith... oh the irony.

I think Fox is able to recognize potential, but they lack the patience (and time slots) for a good show to make it big. Dollhouse is one of three shows I currently watch regularly (the other two being Fringe and the Big Bang Theory), and although I think it&#039;s one of the few shows that actually has a viable plot I also recognize how it wouldnt have a high popularity to the family scene.

We&#039;re talking about possibly unwilling prostitutes being sold to the highest bidder. Not kid-friendly, which is part of its appeal to me.

But, with luck NBC will pick it up. They already run Law &amp; Order SVU and Jay Leno, which makes Dollhouse look more like Full House..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox has good intentions, but they lack faith&#8230; oh the irony.</p>
<p>I think Fox is able to recognize potential, but they lack the patience (and time slots) for a good show to make it big. Dollhouse is one of three shows I currently watch regularly (the other two being Fringe and the Big Bang Theory), and although I think it&#8217;s one of the few shows that actually has a viable plot I also recognize how it wouldnt have a high popularity to the family scene.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re talking about possibly unwilling prostitutes being sold to the highest bidder. Not kid-friendly, which is part of its appeal to me.</p>
<p>But, with luck NBC will pick it up. They already run Law &amp; Order SVU and Jay Leno, which makes Dollhouse look more like Full House..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.28.2009 by mkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=468&#038;cpage=1#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>mkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=468#comment-68</guid>
		<description>As a side note to the cast, vampires would have an aversion to the radiation cast by the fusion of hydrogen nuclei into helium.. 

&quot;The Sun has a spectral class of G2V, with the G2 meaning that its color is yellow and its spectrum contains spectral lines of ionized and neutral metals as well as very weak hydrogen lines, and the V signifying that it, like most stars, is a &quot;dwarf&quot; star on the main sequence.&quot; - http://www.solarnavigator.net/the_sun.htm

In any case, there is a very specific radiation spectrum involved that&#039;s dependent upon the size of the star, the stars composition, and the stage of the star. I think of vampires being burned by sunlight in the same way that I view a microwave burning a marshmallow.

An adjustment in the radiation may still cause problems, but in a far different way.. though I dont know how susceptible the undead are to tumors or other cancerous growths..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a side note to the cast, vampires would have an aversion to the radiation cast by the fusion of hydrogen nuclei into helium.. </p>
<p>&#8220;The Sun has a spectral class of G2V, with the G2 meaning that its color is yellow and its spectrum contains spectral lines of ionized and neutral metals as well as very weak hydrogen lines, and the V signifying that it, like most stars, is a &#8220;dwarf&#8221; star on the main sequence.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.solarnavigator.net/the_sun.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.solarnavigator.net/the_sun.htm</a></p>
<p>In any case, there is a very specific radiation spectrum involved that&#8217;s dependent upon the size of the star, the stars composition, and the stage of the star. I think of vampires being burned by sunlight in the same way that I view a microwave burning a marshmallow.</p>
<p>An adjustment in the radiation may still cause problems, but in a far different way.. though I dont know how susceptible the undead are to tumors or other cancerous growths..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.28.2009 by mkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=468&#038;cpage=1#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>mkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=468#comment-67</guid>
		<description>The Sorceress Pepper is listed as the head of the freedom fighting team, though it could be a joint leadership position with &quot;legendary zombie fighter Captain Patch, and the super genius land fish Marseux&quot;.

Overall, what an incredible concept, though if you can throw in pirates and robots I think you&#039;ll have an epic show on your hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sorceress Pepper is listed as the head of the freedom fighting team, though it could be a joint leadership position with &#8220;legendary zombie fighter Captain Patch, and the super genius land fish Marseux&#8221;.</p>
<p>Overall, what an incredible concept, though if you can throw in pirates and robots I think you&#8217;ll have an epic show on your hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 12.12.2009 by mkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=525&#038;cpage=1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>mkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=525#comment-66</guid>
		<description>The Human Target.

Created by Len Wein and Carmine Infantino about a bodyguard/private detective.

Looks interesting, I&#039;ll be reviewing the comics if I&#039;m able to find them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Human Target.</p>
<p>Created by Len Wein and Carmine Infantino about a bodyguard/private detective.</p>
<p>Looks interesting, I&#8217;ll be reviewing the comics if I&#8217;m able to find them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.28.2009 by markdb</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=468&#038;cpage=1#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>markdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=468#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Patch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RIP Boneyard by Zombrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=425&#038;cpage=1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Zombrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=425#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;m adding this to my &quot;must be read&quot; list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m adding this to my &#8220;must be read&#8221; list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Website Updates: What&#8217;s new and what&#8217;s to come&#8230; by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=421&#038;cpage=1#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=421#comment-61</guid>
		<description>X
Thats our WAY COOL ZAZZLE STORE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X<br />
Thats our WAY COOL ZAZZLE STORE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.21.2009 by D-Train</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=456&#038;cpage=1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>D-Train</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=456#comment-60</guid>
		<description>At the Mountains of Madness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the Mountains of Madness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Website Updates: What&#8217;s new and what&#8217;s to come&#8230; by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=421&#038;cpage=1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=421#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget; we&#039;ll have a donations button soon as well as a direct link to our store at zazzle.com!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget; we&#8217;ll have a donations button soon as well as a direct link to our store at zazzle.com!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.21.2009 by markdb</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=456&#038;cpage=1#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>markdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=456#comment-58</guid>
		<description>At the Mountains of Madness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the Mountains of Madness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.14.2009 by D-Train</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397&#038;cpage=1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>D-Train</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397#comment-57</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s Wrong With Fox?  Politics aside, not much.  Fox is the channel that gave us the X-Files, a show that revived science fiction in the 1990s.  They have also given us shows like Firefly, The Sarah Connor Chronicles, and Dollhouse.  Yes, the latter three shows failed, but if they had more veiwers they would still be on the air.  Fox could have cancelled Dollhouse after one season; they didn&#039;t, which even surprised Whedon.  Since Fox was willing to give Dollhouse a second season chance, I think a more appropriate questions is, What&#039;s wrong with Sci-Fi Fans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s Wrong With Fox?  Politics aside, not much.  Fox is the channel that gave us the X-Files, a show that revived science fiction in the 1990s.  They have also given us shows like Firefly, The Sarah Connor Chronicles, and Dollhouse.  Yes, the latter three shows failed, but if they had more veiwers they would still be on the air.  Fox could have cancelled Dollhouse after one season; they didn&#8217;t, which even surprised Whedon.  Since Fox was willing to give Dollhouse a second season chance, I think a more appropriate questions is, What&#8217;s wrong with Sci-Fi Fans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.14.2009 by Danielb</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397&#038;cpage=1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397#comment-56</guid>
		<description>It is spelled wrong.........
Should be smallPox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is spelled wrong&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Should be smallPox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 6 by Danielb</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=408&#038;cpage=1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=408#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Very informative, thankyou.  answer to the trivia 
Q: What is wrong with Fox 
A: Fox is a mispelled, it should be smallPox. 

Serenity NOW!!!!! Never giveup, never surrender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative, thankyou.  answer to the trivia<br />
Q: What is wrong with Fox<br />
A: Fox is a mispelled, it should be smallPox. </p>
<p>Serenity NOW!!!!! Never giveup, never surrender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.14.2009 by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397&#038;cpage=1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397#comment-54</guid>
		<description>re: mrwashy
Therefore I am guessing that makes NBC the In-N-Out Burger of the television industry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: mrwashy<br />
Therefore I am guessing that makes NBC the In-N-Out Burger of the television industry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.14.2009 by mrwashy</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397&#038;cpage=1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>mrwashy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Two words: Rupert Murdoch

Fox genuinely doesn&#039;t care about story.  (Whedon does a nice bit on Fox and why Firefly was canceled in the special features of the Firefly DVD&#039;s)  They want eyes on the screen fast and don&#039;t really care about story arcs that take half a season.  Fox is the fast food of tv and news networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words: Rupert Murdoch</p>
<p>Fox genuinely doesn&#8217;t care about story.  (Whedon does a nice bit on Fox and why Firefly was canceled in the special features of the Firefly DVD&#8217;s)  They want eyes on the screen fast and don&#8217;t really care about story arcs that take half a season.  Fox is the fast food of tv and news networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast 6 by empressith</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=408&#038;cpage=1#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>empressith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=408#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I feel like Fox picks up shows like Firefly but doesn&#039;t support them. It is almost like they are
okay with the failure of shows that have overarching storylines. If you will recall one of the
most successful shows of the last ten years is Lost, which has a ton of overarching storyarcs.

It&#039;s not like the viewer can&#039;t handle them. It&#039;s that Fox doesn&#039;t want to give us a chance.

Oh yeah, and I loved Futurama. And the Simpsons needs to go. It needed to go about five
years ago. 

Big Bang Theory FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like Fox picks up shows like Firefly but doesn&#8217;t support them. It is almost like they are<br />
okay with the failure of shows that have overarching storylines. If you will recall one of the<br />
most successful shows of the last ten years is Lost, which has a ton of overarching storyarcs.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like the viewer can&#8217;t handle them. It&#8217;s that Fox doesn&#8217;t want to give us a chance.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, and I loved Futurama. And the Simpsons needs to go. It needed to go about five<br />
years ago. </p>
<p>Big Bang Theory FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.14.2009 by Dru</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397&#038;cpage=1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397#comment-51</guid>
		<description>was anything ever right with FOX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was anything ever right with FOX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia for 11.14.2009 by markdb</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397&#038;cpage=1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>markdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=397#comment-50</guid>
		<description>This is a complex question because FOX is an awesome station.  As per wikipedia, the Fox Broadcasting Company (FBC), commonly referred to as Fox (often stylized FOX), is an American television network owned by Fox Entertainment Group, part of Rupert Murdoch&#039;s News Corporation. Launched on October 9, 1986, from 2004 to 2009 Fox was the highest-rated broadcast network in the 18–49 demographic.  To be the highest rated network they have to be doing something right.  Overall i think that fox is still trying to find itself. When it launched it was edgy and hip, it aired shows that were crude and nothing like it was on other channels.  They carried themself with shows like Married with Children and got their golden ticket with The Simpsons.  While they stay on top of the rankings, it doesnt really seem like fox has defined itself with any new shows.  The Simpsons is getting old and has to die in the near future, and contestant shows are cyclical.  I think fox is purely looking for a show to start grooming into the next foundation of the network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a complex question because FOX is an awesome station.  As per wikipedia, the Fox Broadcasting Company (FBC), commonly referred to as Fox (often stylized FOX), is an American television network owned by Fox Entertainment Group, part of Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s News Corporation. Launched on October 9, 1986, from 2004 to 2009 Fox was the highest-rated broadcast network in the 18–49 demographic.  To be the highest rated network they have to be doing something right.  Overall i think that fox is still trying to find itself. When it launched it was edgy and hip, it aired shows that were crude and nothing like it was on other channels.  They carried themself with shows like Married with Children and got their golden ticket with The Simpsons.  While they stay on top of the rankings, it doesnt really seem like fox has defined itself with any new shows.  The Simpsons is getting old and has to die in the near future, and contestant shows are cyclical.  I think fox is purely looking for a show to start grooming into the next foundation of the network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trivia Question for 11.7.2009 by markdb</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=370&#038;cpage=1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>markdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=370#comment-49</guid>
		<description>The first installment of the Dr. Shroud series is entitled &quot;Dr. Shroud in the Alley of the Dolls.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first installment of the Dr. Shroud series is entitled &#8220;Dr. Shroud in the Alley of the Dolls.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Halloween Trivia #1 by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=355&#038;cpage=1#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=355#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Hey, look at  this!!!
Nice going, Kriana will contact you to get your info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, look at  this!!!<br />
Nice going, Kriana will contact you to get your info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Halloween Trivia #2 by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=357&#038;cpage=1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=357#comment-47</guid>
		<description>ands we have a winner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ands we have a winner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Halloween Trivia #2 by jvdestroyer81</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=357&#038;cpage=1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>jvdestroyer81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=357#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Samhainophobia is the fear or phobia of Halloween. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samhainophobia is the fear or phobia of Halloween. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Halloween Trivia #1 by jvdestroyer81</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=355&#038;cpage=1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>jvdestroyer81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=355#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Elvira&#039;s real name is Cassandra Peterson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elvira&#8217;s real name is Cassandra Peterson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ComiCon Boston 2009 or Lets Set The Wayback Machine For 1972, Sherman. by claynferno</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>claynferno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=329#comment-44</guid>
		<description>hey y&#039;all

We&#039;d love to do an interview, thanks for the shout out!

you can hit us up at info@l-o-gcast.com or email me directly
claynferno@gmail.com


Best, 

Clay S. Fernald</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey y&#8217;all</p>
<p>We&#8217;d love to do an interview, thanks for the shout out!</p>
<p>you can hit us up at <a href="mailto:info@l-o-gcast.com">info@l-o-gcast.com</a> or email me directly<br />
<a href="mailto:claynferno@gmail.com">claynferno@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>Best, </p>
<p>Clay S. Fernald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast #3: Comic Con! by Chompa</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=324&#038;cpage=1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Chompa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=324#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hey - I didn&#039;t get the email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; I didn&#8217;t get the email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talkcast #3: Comic Con! by Chompa</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=324&#038;cpage=1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Chompa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=324#comment-42</guid>
		<description>The answer is the face of Boe.  aka Captain Jack Harkness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is the face of Boe.  aka Captain Jack Harkness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our First Podcast in Our NEW &#8220;NOT A STUDIO&#8221;! by Kriana</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=260&#038;cpage=1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Kriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=260#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Still no winner for the trivia question - THERE&#039;S STILL TIME TO TWEET!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still no winner for the trivia question &#8211; THERE&#8217;S STILL TIME TO TWEET!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tune in Tomorrow Night to WIN! by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=252&#038;cpage=1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=252#comment-40</guid>
		<description>A huge Thank You to COMFAN COMICS. If you&#039;re in  their area and you drop in, tell em Sci-Fi Saturday Night sent ya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A huge Thank You to COMFAN COMICS. If you&#8217;re in  their area and you drop in, tell em Sci-Fi Saturday Night sent ya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So how does this all work anyway? by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=239&#038;cpage=1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=239#comment-39</guid>
		<description>so easy, even I can do it! Hope to hear from you all this Saturday night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so easy, even I can do it! Hope to hear from you all this Saturday night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surprise! by Sc00ter</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=237&#038;cpage=1#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Sc00ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=237#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I was there! Woohoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there! Woohoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surprise! by Dru</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=237&#038;cpage=1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=237#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Nice the site looks great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice the site looks great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GRANITECON CONCORD 2009 by Kriana</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=234&#038;cpage=1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Kriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=234#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Can you show me your moves?

HI CHRIS AND QUINCY (and Brett!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you show me your moves?</p>
<p>HI CHRIS AND QUINCY (and Brett!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Last Post For A While and BattleStar, The Big Finish by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=213#comment-26</guid>
		<description>We always look to the skies, my friend; but we will miss your commentary while doing so.  I&#039;ll be happy to pick up the slack as it were --- you just take care of yourself and leave the writing to myself &amp; K for a while.  Excelsior!

Illustrator X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We always look to the skies, my friend; but we will miss your commentary while doing so.  I&#8217;ll be happy to pick up the slack as it were &#8212; you just take care of yourself and leave the writing to myself &amp; K for a while.  Excelsior!</p>
<p>Illustrator X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday – America’s New Sci-Fi Night by Mort</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=208&#038;cpage=1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Mort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=208#comment-23</guid>
		<description>You know, I have never liked Fox Television. They had a pilot of mine for almost 2 years promising delevopment, and finally when it was all said and done, last week thay signed Joaquin Pheomix to the lead. Since WHEN is he emotionall ready to play the lead in &quot;Mr. Lara Croft, in I married a Tomb Raider&quot;? 
God, I hate Fox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I have never liked Fox Television. They had a pilot of mine for almost 2 years promising delevopment, and finally when it was all said and done, last week thay signed Joaquin Pheomix to the lead. Since WHEN is he emotionall ready to play the lead in &#8220;Mr. Lara Croft, in I married a Tomb Raider&#8221;?<br />
God, I hate Fox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lois Lane, Godzilla, and the Vibrator by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=205&#038;cpage=1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=205#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Agreed, lets keep Our Favorite Comic Stores in 
business. From your title, I was very afraid you were also going
 to make a pitch to keep Our Favorite Adult Stores 
from going under (oh hell, that was a bad pun).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, lets keep Our Favorite Comic Stores in<br />
business. From your title, I was very afraid you were also going<br />
 to make a pitch to keep Our Favorite Adult Stores<br />
from going under (oh hell, that was a bad pun).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why is Doctor Who Pissing Me Off? by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=204&#038;cpage=1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=204#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Will be pissed?  Dome, howzabout PISSED OFF THIS FREAKIN&#039; SECOND?!?  Not so much that Tenant&#039;s leaving; I mean, being a Who fan means that sooner or later your Doc&#039;s going to be clutching his chest, looking up all teary-eyed at the companion of the month and spouting some tear-jerking line before going all glowy-gooey and poing!  new actor, same role.  No, what&#039;s got me ready to break down the doors of the BBC is the new guy they cast.  Once again, we play up to the younger demographics and bring in some pretty boy who looks like he REALLY couldn&#039;t wait for Mama Mia to come out on DVD.  Why can&#039;t they bring in someone older?  The first really &quot;young&quot; Doctor was Peter Davison, the FIFTH one to play the role after 19 years (at that time).  Tom Baker, Sylvester McCoy, Patrick Troughton --- these guys are legendary in the Whoniverse, but they wouldn&#039;t make a casting call nowadays.  I&#039;ll give junior a chance, but COME ON already...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be pissed?  Dome, howzabout PISSED OFF THIS FREAKIN&#8217; SECOND?!?  Not so much that Tenant&#8217;s leaving; I mean, being a Who fan means that sooner or later your Doc&#8217;s going to be clutching his chest, looking up all teary-eyed at the companion of the month and spouting some tear-jerking line before going all glowy-gooey and poing!  new actor, same role.  No, what&#8217;s got me ready to break down the doors of the BBC is the new guy they cast.  Once again, we play up to the younger demographics and bring in some pretty boy who looks like he REALLY couldn&#8217;t wait for Mama Mia to come out on DVD.  Why can&#8217;t they bring in someone older?  The first really &#8220;young&#8221; Doctor was Peter Davison, the FIFTH one to play the role after 19 years (at that time).  Tom Baker, Sylvester McCoy, Patrick Troughton &#8212; these guys are legendary in the Whoniverse, but they wouldn&#8217;t make a casting call nowadays.  I&#8217;ll give junior a chance, but COME ON already&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Damn Good Authors You Have Never Heard Of.  John Zakour by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=190&#038;cpage=1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=190#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Everything cant be classic, but I want to make peeps aware of whats out there, Just as you&#039;re ranting about going to a comic store, Hey Kids Lets Go to a BOOK STORE just for the hell of it and see whats up. This guy is GOOD, and for my money JK IS a hack.
Beerfest not so sure, gonna have to watch the Directors Cut tonight
Enjoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything cant be classic, but I want to make peeps aware of whats out there, Just as you&#8217;re ranting about going to a comic store, Hey Kids Lets Go to a BOOK STORE just for the hell of it and see whats up. This guy is GOOD, and for my money JK IS a hack.<br />
Beerfest not so sure, gonna have to watch the Directors Cut tonight<br />
Enjoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Damn Good Authors You Have Never Heard Of.  John Zakour by Illustrator X</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=190&#038;cpage=1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=190#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Oh, get over it Dome!  Every diehard sci-fi reader can rattle off two dozen authors that nobody&#039;s ever heard of but THEY&#039;RE THE GREATEST WRITERS OF ALL TIME, DAMNIT.  Once in a while this is true (for years, nobody had ever heard of Philip K Dick) but usually they&#039;re just average hacks that some fanboy remembers because it was the only thing to read on a trip to Maine or something.  I&#039;ve been told over and over that Kilgore Trout (or whoever you want to insert here) is a better writer than Ray Bradbury, John Clavell and Robert Anton Wilson combined, and I&#039;ve yet to see the proof.  Hell, the last person to pull the &quot;obscure sci-fi writer rant&quot; on me went on to explain how JK Rowling is a talentless hack and that Beerfest is the funniest comedy of the past thirty years.  Draw your own conclusions.

That said, let&#039;s hear it for the novels of British author John Christopher!  He&#039;s the best writer EVER!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, get over it Dome!  Every diehard sci-fi reader can rattle off two dozen authors that nobody&#8217;s ever heard of but THEY&#8217;RE THE GREATEST WRITERS OF ALL TIME, DAMNIT.  Once in a while this is true (for years, nobody had ever heard of Philip K Dick) but usually they&#8217;re just average hacks that some fanboy remembers because it was the only thing to read on a trip to Maine or something.  I&#8217;ve been told over and over that Kilgore Trout (or whoever you want to insert here) is a better writer than Ray Bradbury, John Clavell and Robert Anton Wilson combined, and I&#8217;ve yet to see the proof.  Hell, the last person to pull the &#8220;obscure sci-fi writer rant&#8221; on me went on to explain how JK Rowling is a talentless hack and that Beerfest is the funniest comedy of the past thirty years.  Draw your own conclusions.</p>
<p>That said, let&#8217;s hear it for the novels of British author John Christopher!  He&#8217;s the best writer EVER!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Read &#8216;em for free! by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=184&#038;cpage=1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=184#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Skrulls is great. Thanks for the posing X!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skrulls is great. Thanks for the posing X!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The video is a FAKE! by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=177&#038;cpage=1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=177#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Well, what did we expect. I was hoping for the energiser bunny, but this is much funnier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, what did we expect. I was hoping for the energiser bunny, but this is much funnier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attention Mr. and Mrs. America and All the Ships at Sea!  All The Nudes That’s Fit To Print, Local, National, Zombie Strippers &amp; GRANITECON by The Dome</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=172&#038;cpage=1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=172#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hey, I like what I said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I like what I said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SCUD, Conan &amp; Skrulls by Kriana</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=171&#038;cpage=1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Kriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=171#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I fixed the comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fixed the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one) by Writers Strike &#187; Hey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one)</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=151&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Writers Strike &#187; Hey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=151#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Sci Fi Saturday Night wrote an interesting post today on Hey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one)Here&#8217;s a quick excerptHey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one) The Dome 2/20/2008 The WGA Writers Strike has had many consequences, many intended, some completely unintended. To understand what one of the MAJOR unintended consequences is, we have to take you, the home viewer, into the murky backrooms of how stuff gets on TV. From the time a writer gets an idea to the time a pilot is made and accepted for airing on a network and a schedule is set for the network, comes a glitzy insiders showcases, innocuou [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sci Fi Saturday Night wrote an interesting post today on Hey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one)Here&#8217;s a quick excerptHey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one) The Dome 2/20/2008 The WGA Writers Strike has had many consequences, many intended, some completely unintended. To understand what one of the MAJOR unintended consequences is, we have to take you, the home viewer, into the murky backrooms of how stuff gets on TV. From the time a writer gets an idea to the time a pilot is made and accepted for airing on a network and a schedule is set for the network, comes a glitzy insiders showcases, innocuou [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one) by Affiliates &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one)</title>
		<link>http://www.scifisaturdaynight.com/?p=151&#038;cpage=1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliates &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hey, NBC Has An Idea! (just not a good one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifico.org/sfsn/?p=151#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
